The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a review application filed by appellants, holding that merit rearguement is impermissible under the garb of review.
Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.01.14 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
123
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA-RS-2-2019 (O&M) IN RSA-4154-2015 Date of decision : 11.01.2019
M/s Vishnu Kumar Gupta and others
... Appellants
Versus
Union of India and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta, in person, for the review applicant/appellant.
AMIT RAWAL, J.
This application has been filed seeking review of the order
dated 21.11.2018.
Under the garb of review, arguments are sought to be
readdressed on merits, which cannot be permitted.
The present review application is, accordingly, dismissed.
( AMIT RAWAL) 11.01.2019 JUDGE
Yogesh Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No
Whether Reportable Yes/ No
M/s Vishnu Kumar Gupta and others
Union of India and others
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
