The High Court condoned a 9-day delay in filing a review application in an appeal regarding a Constable. The review was dismissed as there was no error apparent on the face of the record in the original judgment.
Delay for review application condoned; review application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RA-LP-41-2019 ( O&M ) in LPA-345-2014
EHC Constable Subhash Chander Vs. State of Haryana and others
Present: Mr. Samarth Sagar, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the applicants-respondents.
Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
CM-3861-LPA-2019
For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, and in the interest of justice, delay of 9 days in filing the review application is condoned.
Application is, accordingly, allowed.
RA-LP-41-2019
There is no error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment dated 13.08.2019 passed in LPA-345-2014.
Review application is, accordingly, dismissed.
( RAJIV SHARMA ) JUDGE
December 06, 2019
( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU ) JUDGE
ndj
NAROTAM DASS 2019.12.09 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC CHANDIGARH
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 9 days in filing a review application.
Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record in the impugned judgment.
Constable Subhash Chander
State of Haryana
Rajiv Sharma
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
