Condoned a 95-day delay in refiling an appeal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and commended the merits to a concurrent judgment.
Delay of 95 days in refiling the appeal is condensed; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.: 215
FAO No.4852 of 2015 (O & M) Date of Decision: April 01, 2019
Billu
..... APPELLANT
VERSUS Bhawal @ Puran & others
..... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL
PRESENT : - Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for the respondents.
. . .
Rekha Mittal, J (Oral)
CM No.14968-CII of 2015
For reasons given in the application, delay of 95 days in
refiling the present appeal is condoned.
Application is allowed.
FAO No.4852 of 2015
For orders, see judgment of even date passed in FAO No.9392 of 2014 titled ‘Deep Chand vs. Bhawal @ Puran & others’.
(Rekha Mittal) April 01, 2019 Judge avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No
AVIN KUMAR 2019.04.05 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Billu
Bhawal @ Puran & others
Rekha Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
