decreed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 20.08.1999 and in order to recover the said amount Gurjant Singh decree-holder filed a regular execution petition on 18.01.2002 and when the case fixed for reply to an application filed for attachment of the land of the judgment-debtor, then the objections were raised by the sons of the judgment-debtor claiming that they are bona fide owners of the land sought to be attached in view of the decree dated 28.07.1994. The copy of mutation no. 2836 on the basis of decree dated 28.07.1994 has been placed on file vide which the land owned by Amarjit Kaur judgment-debtor has been shown to have been mutated in favour of Rajpal and Baljinder Singh her sons. The pronote is dated 15.04.1993 and the decree passed is dated 28.07.1994. The civil suit was filed by Gurjant Singh in the year 1996 but it is a fact that the transfer of the land was made by the judgment-debtor in favour of her sons-objectors after executing the pronote on 15.04.1993 in favour of the decree-holder for an amount of ` 50,000/-. So on thorough perusal of controversy between the parties and impugned order, it is made out that it was a fraudulent transfer in order to avoid the payment of the amount and so no infirmity has been committed by the learned trial Court by passing the impugned order.”
