Petitioner's Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous because the transfer order under challenge was cancelled.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB ANDHARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 859-2019 Date of decision:-28.03.2019
RAJ KUMAR
.....Petitioner
vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:Mr. Surinder Dagar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana
RITU BAHRI, J.(Oral)
Learned State counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition stands infructuous, as the transfer order dated 07.01.2019 stands cancelled vide order dated 01.03.2019.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(RITU BAHRI) 28.03.2019 JUDGE G Arora Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
Gaurav Arora 2019.04.04 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
RAJ KUMAR
STATE OF HARYANA
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
