Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking quashing of an order allowing passage through co-owned land, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition.
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP 8112/2019
120
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP 8112/2019 Date of decision:27.03.2019
Ram Kishan
..............Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana and others
..............Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Hon'ble Mr.Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi
Present:Mr.Ashok Verma,Advocate for the petitioner.
Jaswant Singh,J,(Oral).
By filing present writ petition, petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated 30.11.2018 (P-15) passed by Commissioner, Gurugram Division, Gurugram whereby respondent no.3-Birmati, on an application moved by her, has been provided passage through the land of petitioners, being one of the co-owners.
At the time of hearing,learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(Jaswant Singh) Judge
| 27.03.2019. | (Arun Kumar Tyagi) | |
|---|---|---|
| joshi | Judge | |
| Whether | Yes/No | |
| Speaking/reasoned | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
RAJINDER PARSHAD JOSHI 2019.03.28 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Kishan
State of Haryana
Birmati
Jaswant Singh
Arun Kumar Tyagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
