Disposed

Talochan Singh v. Union India Insurance Company Ltd. and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Mar 2019CWP/6766/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order addressed a writ petition where the petitioner complained that his appeal memorial under Regulation 40 of the United India Insurance Company (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 2014, filed on 07.09.2018, remained undecided. The Court directed the respondents to dispose of the pending memorial.

What did the court decide?

Direct the respondents to decide the pending memorial dated 07.09.2018 by passing an appropriate speaking order within three months.

Talochan Singh Vs Union India Insurance… — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CWP-6766-2019

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-6766-2019 Date of decision: - 13.03.2019

Tarlochan Singh

....Petitioner

Versus

United India Insurance Company Limited and others

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

¶11

Present:Ms. Shuchi Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

¶13

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)

¶14

In the present writ petition, the grievance which is being raised by the petitioner is that memorial dated 07.09.2018 (Annexure P-2), which he submitted in pursuance to the Regulation 40 of United India Insurance Company (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 2014, has not been decided by the respondents so far.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had approached this Court by filing CWP No.22635 of 2013, which was decided on 24.08.2018. In the said writ petition, petitioner had challenged imposition of penalty vide order dated 09.05.2013 and the order of the appellate authority dated 30.07.2013, by which an appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected.

¶16

NARESH KUMAR 2019.03.25 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶17

CWP-6766-2019

¶18

-2-

¶19

While disposing the writ petition, this Court directed the petitioner to avail alternative remedy by filing the memorial under Regulation 40 of United India Insurance Company (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 2014, which he filed on 07.09.2018.

¶20

Counsel for the petitioner states that no decision has been taken by the respondents so far on the memorial filed by the petitioner on 07.09.2018 and prays that the respondents be directed to decide the same in a time bound manner.

¶21

Without going into the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide memorial dated 07.09.2018 (Annexure P-2), filed by the petitioner, by passing an appropriate speaking order, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶22

Present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes Whether reportable? No

¶24

March 13, 2019 naresh.k

¶25

NARESH KUMAR 2019.03.25 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Talochan Singh v. Union India Insurance Company Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Talochan Singh v. Union India Insurance Company Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurcharan Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Gurcharan Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Naseeb Kaur Vs State of Haryana and Others

Shimla Devi Vs State of Punjab and Others

Darshan Singh (Deceased) through His Legal Heirs Vs State of Punjab and Others

Mehar Singh Dhaka Vs State of Haryana and Others