Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition to pursue appropriate remedies. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the requested liberty.
Liberty to avail appropriate remedies if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-594-2019 Date of decision: - 05.02.2019
Rajdev Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present:Mr. Munish Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states
that he be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition to enable the
petitioner to avail his appropriate remedies, if any, available.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as prayed for.
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) February 05, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k
Whether reasoned/speaking? No Whether reportable? No
NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.06 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Rajdev Singh
State of Punjab
Harsimran Singh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
