Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition after appeal against punishment was set aside. Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to seek further appropriate proceedings.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach respondents by filing review/appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-5798-2019
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-5798-2019 Date of decision: - 05.03.2019
Surinderpal Singh Grewal
....Petitioner
Versus
Registrar Cooperative Societies, Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present:Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was imposed a punishment of recovery, vide order dated 23.11.2009. Against the said order, petitioner had filed an appeal before the appellate authority. During the pendency of the appeal, respondents started the proceedings for the recovery of the said amount by initiating arbitration proceedings under Sections 55/56 of the Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961.
Counsel for the petitioner further states that in those proceedings, the petitioner has been held liable to pay the said amount, which has been imposed by way of punishment.
Counsel for the petitioner further states that now after passing of the impugned order dated 18.09.2018, the appeal filed by the
NARESH KUMAR 2019.03.11 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-5798-2019
-2-
petitioner against the order imposing punishment has been decided and the punishment has been set aside, therefore, he prays that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the respondents by filing review/appropriate proceedings in respect of the facts which have come into being after the impugned order was passed.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as prayed for.
March 05, 2019 naresh.k
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes Whether reportable? No
NARESH KUMAR 2019.03.11 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Surinderpal Singh Grewal
Registrar Cooperative Societies, Punjab
Harsimran Singh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
