Disposed

Anju Pruthi and Others v. State of Haryana and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Apr 2019CWP/5751/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this civil writ petition, the petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus directing the State to restore 3% increments granted upon promotion to ACP scale. The court noted prior precedent and a legal notice served on the State. The court disposed of the petition by directing the State to examine the legal notice. This was an oral order without detailed reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 3 to look into the legal notice dated 01.12.2018 and pass appropriate orders within six months.

Anju Pruthi and Others Vs State of Haryana… — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CWP No. 5751-2019

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

C.W.P 5751 of 2019 Date of decision : 29.04.2019

¶5

Anju Pruthi and others

¶6

......Petitioners

¶7

versus

¶8

State of Haryana and another

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶11

Present: Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

¶13

RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)

¶14

Through the instant civil writ petition, preferred under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have sought the issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to restore increments granted @3% while fixing pay in the ACP scale on promotion.

¶15

At the very outset learned counsel submits that the issue raised in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in a case of Narender Pal Singh Arya and another vs. State of Haryana and others, passed

¶16

in CWP No. 3922-2011 and connected matters, decided on 03.10.2016. LPA filed against the said judgment also stands dismissed on 31.07.2018 (P-5), vide LPA No. 2460-2017.

¶17

In this regard, petitioners have served legal notice dated 01.12.2018 (P-6) but no action has been taken till date.

¶18

Issue notice of motion.

¶19

On asking of the Court, Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall supply copy Gaurav Arora of the petition to learned State counsel by today itself. 2019.05.29 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶20

CWP No. 5751-2019

¶21

¶22

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is being disposed of by giving direction to respondent No. 3 to look into the legal notice dated 01.12.2018 (P-6) of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders, in view of Annexure P-4 and 5. This exercise shall be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶23

April 29, 2019 G Arora

¶24

(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE

¶25

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶26

Gaurav Arora 2019.05.29 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Anju Pruthi and Others v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anju Pruthi and Others v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Radhey Shyam Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Kuldeep Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Sunita and Ors. Vs Prem and Ors.

M/S Prakash Parcel Services Ltd. Vs M/S Rohan Infotech

Bijender Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Ors.