Petitioner in a contested recruitment appeal sought selection for a vacant post despite the final result being declared previously; the court dismissed the petition immediately upon noting the delay of over six months after the appointed date.
none
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 4924-2019 Date of decision : 25.02.2019
Minakshi
......Petitioner
versus
Haryana Staff Selection Commission
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
Pursuant to advertisement dated 28.06.2015 (P-1), the petitioner applied for the post of PGT Hindi under SC category. The petitioner cleared the written examination, as per result dated 20.07.2018 (P-2) and was called for scrutiny of documents. The petitioner secured 100 marks and the last candidate who was called for interview secured 98 marks, as per result dated 19.08.2018 (P-3). The petitioner gave representation dated 12.12.2018 (P-5) but on 10.12.2018, the final result was already declared.
The grievance of the petitioner before this Court that some posts of TGT Hindi are still lying vacant and thus petitioner be selected for the above post.
This petition at the very outset is dismissed, as the final result has already been declared on 10.12.2018 and the petitioner has approached this Court after a gap of almost 06 months from the date when the candidate who secured less marks was called for interview.
February 25, 2019 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Gaurav Arora 2019.02.26 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Minakshi
Haryana Staff Selection Commission
RITU BAHRI
GAURAV ARORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
