The Division Bench, with a single judge, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous following a connected writ petition that redressed the grievance of the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed as it had been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.4806 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.24.07.2019
Rashmi Chauhan and others
...Petitioners
Vs
State of Haryana and others ..Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate for petitioners.
Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Counsel for petitioners submitted that in view of statement made by State counsel in connected writ petitions resulting into passing of order dated 22.05.2019 by the Division Bench, grievance of petitioner has been redressed and no cause of action survives for consideration.
Writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered
infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE July 24, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.07.24 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rashmi Chauhan and others
State of Haryana and others
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
