COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 4080 of 2018 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 28. 02. 2019
Food Cor por at i on of I ndi a Cl ass I V Kar amchar i Sangh
…. . Pet i t i oner
ver sus
Food Cor por at i on of I ndi a and ot her s
. . . . . Respondent s
CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI , JUDGE
Pr esent : Mr . Vi kas Si ngh, Advocat e f or t he pet i t i oner s Shr i Chet an Mi t t al , Seni or Advocat e wi t h Shr i J. S. Pur i and Shr i Udi t Gar g, Advocat e f or FCI , Punj ab Regi on wi t h Shr i Ar shdeep Si ngh Thi nd, Gener al Manager
Shr i Sumeet Goel , Advocat e wi t h Ms. Ranamdeep Kaur , Advocat e f or FCI , Har yana Regi on wi t h Shr i Om Par kash, Gener al Manager
KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE : ( Or al )
Thi s wr i t pet i t i on st ands di sposed of i n t er ms of our det ai l ed or der passed t oday i n LPA No. 930 of 2018 t i t l ed as Bi shan Lal and ot her s vs. Food Cor por at i on of I ndi a and ot her s.
( KRI SHNA MURARI ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE
NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO
PARKASH CHAND 2019.03.07 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
PARKASH CHAND 2019.03.07 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bishan Lal and others vs. Food Corporation of India and othersReferred¶12
Bishan Lal and others vs. Food Corporation of India and others
Food Corporation of India Class IV Karamchari Sangh
Food Corporation of India
Krishna Murari
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
