Dismissed

Balwan Singh Kundu v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC14 Feb 2019CWP/4018/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, without expressing an opinion on the merits, directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's legal notice and representation within three months regarding delayed release of retirement benefits and interest.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to decide legal notice dated 01.06.2018 and representation dated 30.06.2018 within three months.

Balwan Singh Kundu Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CWP-4018-2019

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-4018-2019 Date of decision: - 14.02.2019

¶5

Balwan Singh Kundu

¶6

....Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Haryana and others

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

¶11

Present:Mr. R.S. Kundu, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶12

¶13

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is entitled for interest on the delayed release of his retiral benefits. He further states that the petitioner has been retired w.e.f. 31.07.2012 on attaining the age of 58 years, whereas he was entitled for continuance of service till the age of 60 years, therefore, he is entitled for salary for a period of two years.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner further states that for the relief which has been sought in the present writ petition, the petitioner has served the respondents with a legal notice on 01.06.2018 (Annexure P-15) as well as representation dated 30.06.2018 (Annexure P-19), which are still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said legal notice and representation.

¶16

NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.22 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶17

CWP-4018-2019

¶18

-2-

¶19

In view of the request made, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the claim being made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to decide the legal notice dated 01.06.2018 (Annexure P-15) as well as representation dated 30.06.2018 (Annexure P-19) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶20

Present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶21

February 14, 2019 naresh.k

¶22

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE

¶23

Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes Whether reportable? No

¶24

NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.22 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Balwan Singh Kundu v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balwan Singh Kundu v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jarnail Singh Vs M/S Skyrise Builders, Peer Machhaila and Others

Balbir Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

SBI Vrs 2017 Employees Association Regd Thr Its President Vs State Bank of India and Others

Vijay Kumar Vs Lal Singh

Baljeet Singh and Others Vs the State of Punjab and Others

Swarnjit Kaur and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Others