Petition for directions to count wages service towards pension. Court notes respondent passed orders disbursing benefits. No further orders required. Petition disposed without intervention.
None; respondent had already disbursed benefits via revised PPO.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.W.P 24766 of 2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P 24766 of 2017 Date of decision : 22.04.2019
Lachman Dass
......Petitioner
versus
U.H.B.V.N. Ltd. & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. S.K. Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent.
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed for issuance of direction to the respondent to count the daily wager service w.e.f. 01.12.1978 to 25.07.1987 and 25.07.1987 to 19.07.1990 on work charge basis.
On notice of the petition a short written statement by way of affidavit has been filed and as per this affidavit respondent no. 3 has passed office order dated 29.05.2018 (R-1) for counting daily wages service for the period w.e.f. 01.12.1978 to 25.07.1987 towards pensionary benefits of petitioner and further vide order dated 12.07.2018 for counting of work charge service w.e.f. 25.07.1987 to 19.07.1990 towards pensionary benefits. The petitioner stood retired on 13.04.2018 and deposited Rs. 20,373 as EPF amount of nigam share with interest. All the benefit has been disbursed to the petitioner as per revised PPO (R-3) through RTGS Rs. 143,380 vide cheque no. 0556906 dated 12.09.2018 (R-4).
In view of the above affidavit, no further orders are required to be
Gaurav Arora 2019.05.09 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
C.W.P 24766 of 2017
2
passed in the present petition.
Disposed of.
April 22, 2019 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Gaurav Arora 2019.05.09 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction to count daily wager and work charge service towards pensionary benefits is required when the employer has already passed orders disbursing benefits.
Lachman Dass
U.H.B.V.N. Ltd.
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
