Disposed

Resham Singh and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC1 Aug 2019CWP/21011/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order addresses a writ petition regarding entitlement to salary for posts discharged on current duty charge. The court directed the respondents to decide the pending representation within three months without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to decide the representation dated 13.08.2018 within three months.

Resham Singh and Another Vs State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CWP-21011-2019

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-21011-2019 Date of decision: - 01.08.2019

¶5

Resham Singh and another

¶6

....Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

¶11

Present:None for the petitioners.

¶12

¶13

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)

¶14

As per the averments made in the present writ petition, petitioners have discharged the duties of the higher posts of Kanungo on current duty charge. In respect of petitioner No.1, namely, Sh. Resham Singh, he discharged the duties of the post of Kanungo on current duty charge from 20.03.2013 to 31.12.2014 and in respect of petitioner No.2, namely, Sh. Gurmail Singh, he discharged the duties of the post of Kanungo on current duty charge from 19.05.2016 to 30.04.2018 and therefore, keeping in view the settled principle of law, petitioners are entitled for the salary of the posts of which they had discharged their duties on higher post.

¶15

From the pleadings, it transpires that for the relief, which has been sought in the present writ petition, petitioners have submitted a

¶16

NARESH KUMAR 2019.08.05 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶17

CWP-21011-2019

¶18

-2-

¶19

representation dated 13.08.2018 (Annexure P-7), which is still pending consideration with the respondents.

¶20

Interest of justice will be served, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said representation by passing an appropriate speaking order.

¶21

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and entitlement of the petitioners in respect of the claim made in the writ petition/representation, the respondents are directed to decide the representation dated 13.08.2018 (Annexure P-7) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶22

Present writ petition stands disposed of

¶23

August 01, 2019 naresh.k

¶24

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE

¶25

Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes Whether reportable? No

¶26

NARESH KUMAR 2019.08.05 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Resham Singh and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Resham Singh and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaimal Singh Vs Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and Another

Jagjit Singh Vs Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and Another

Gurmeet Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Jagdish Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others

Om Parkash Vs State of Haryana and Others

Tarachand Vs State of Haryana and Ors.