Petitioner withdrew the public interest litigation with liberty to approach the competent authority. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.20854 of 2019 Date of decision:20.12.2019
Sunita Rani
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:Mr. N.P.S.Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.
SUVIR SEHGAL J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the
present writ petition with liberty to move an appropriate application before respondent No.5 who is seized of the matter.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE December 20, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2019.12.20 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Sunita Rani
State of Punjab
Suvir Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
