The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the present writ petition, allowing the petitioner to withdraw it with liberty to file a civil suit, citing a disputed question of fact and law.
Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a civil suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.19785 of 2019 Date of decision:28.08.2019
Karan Singh
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
One of the prime reasons seeking quashing of the impugned orders is that writ petition involved disputed question of fact and law. The statement and documentary evidence during the disciplinary proceedings have not been appreciated in correct perspective.
In view of aforementioned fact, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of Court for withdrawal of present writ petition with liberty to file civil suit.
Ordered accordingly.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 28, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2019.08.29 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Karan Singh
State of Haryana and others
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
