petitioners reiterated the findings of the previous committee. For the reasons best known to it, Mr. Rajiv Prashad, HCS, Joint Director Administration, Secondary Education, Haryana, was appointed as Enquiry Officer to look into matter of selection process of Assistant Professors in the subjects of Economics, Political Science, History, Mathematics, Sociology, Chemistry and Geography, in the aforementioned Institute at Jhajjar. In order to over come the compliance of principles of natural justice, an attempt has been made by the respondents to rely upon report dated 10.08.2018 (Annexure R-5), to contend that in case selection process is scrapped, petitioners may not challenge the same on that account, but the fact of the matter is that the petitioners' probation period completed without any impediment. Services had been impeccable as no adverse remark has been communicated so far. If at all the Department was aggrieved, should have confronted the petitioners with show cause notice and dissatisfied with the same, procedure of enquiry, which is known to service jurisprudence, ought to have been adopted. In support of his contentions, relies upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in “Shridhar V/s Nagar Palika, Jaunpur and others” 1990 AIR SC 307 , to contend that even if, service conditions of petitioners have not been confirmed by specific order or in the absence of implied confirmation, principles of natural justice are required to be followed, in other words, services of petitioners cannot be dispensed with, in the manner and mode, as has been done by the respondents, thus, urges this Court for setting aside the impugned orders.