This is an un-reasoned oral order which refers the petitioner to a detailed order passed in a connected matter. No substantive legal proposition is determined in this specific judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-11990-2005 Date of decision: - 17.09.2019
Baldev Singh Mangat
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: - Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Navdeep Chhabra, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)
For detailed order, see order passed in CWP-701-2005 titled
'Madan Lal Gupta Vs. State of Punjab and another' of even date.
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) September 17, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k
Whether reasoned/speaking? No Whether reportable? No
NARESH KUMAR 2019.10.18 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Baldev Singh Mangat
State of Punjab
Harsimran Singh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
