The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition (CWP No.11216 of 2018) because it was found to be infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
266-A
CWP No.11216 of 2018 (O & M) Date of Decision: 29.01.2019
Sadhu Ram and others
. . . . .Petitioners
Vs.
State of Punjab and another.
. . . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: - Mr. B. S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Senior DAG, Punjab.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present
petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN)
JUDGE
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) 29.01.2019 JUDGE A.Kaundal
Whether speaking /reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
AMIT KAUNDAL 2019.01.30 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sadhu Ram and others
State of Punjab and another
Rakesh Kumar Jain
Anupinder Singh Grewal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
