The court dismissed CWP No. 10289 of 2019 as notionally connected to a prior judgment, directing that parties follow the order in CWP No. 20171 of 2018 without delivering a separate reasoned judgment.
Directing parties to follow the order in CWP No. 20171 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Shivani Gupta 2019.11.07 10:57
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 10289 of 2019 Date of decision: 06.11.2019
Dilbag and others
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. M.K. Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate, for HUDA (now HSVP).
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
For order, see judgment of even date passed in CWP No. 20171
of 2018, Ramkishan @ Krishan vs. State of Haryana and others.
06.11.2019 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Dilbag and others
State of Haryana and others
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
