This judgment dismisses an application as having been rendered infructuous because the petitioner's son has been booked in two criminal cases under the NDPS Act and is already on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-976 of 2018 Date of Decision: 19.03.2019
Paramjit Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:None for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep S. Gill, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
According to reply by way of affidavit of Gurinderbir Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Jandiala, Amritsar-Rural, filed on behalf of the State today, son of the petitioner has been booked in two criminal cases bearing FIR No.232 dated 12.12.2018 and FIR No.97 dated 10.06.2018 registered under Sections 22 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Stations Chattiwind and Jandiala, Amritsar-Rural, respectively, which are under investigation. He is already on bail in these cases.
In view of above factual position, petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) March 19, 2019 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.03.27 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Paramjit Kaur
State
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
