The petitioner withdrew the constitutional revision petition after argument. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
The prayer to withdraw the petition is accepted; the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
256
CRWP-787-2018 (O & M) Date of Decision:26.09.2019
DANIELSON
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ BAJAJ
Present: Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sukant Gupta, Addl. PP for UT, Chandigarh.
Ms. Preeti Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5.
MANOJ BAJAJ, J.(ORAL)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner
wishes to withdraw the present petition.
The prayer is accepted.
The petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
26.09.2019 (MANOJ BAJAJ) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
11
Sheetal Gawri 2019.09.30 12:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Danielson
Union Territory Chandigarh
Manoj Bajaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
