Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition as having become infructuous because the FIR underlying the petition had been cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-9261 of 2018 Date of decision: 28.01.2019
Sunhara Singh
..Petitioner
Versus
Vikas Rana and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioner.
None for respondents No.1 to 3.
SI Karambir, in person.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
SI Karambir, while appearing in person submits that the FIR
has been cancelled.
In view of submission made above, nothing survives in the
present petition and the same has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
28.01.2019 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
NEETU RANI 2019.01.29 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Sunhara Singh
Vikas Rana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
