Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition at this stage. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without recording any substantive observations or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
209-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.879 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.07.2019
Satnam Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Jasvir Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Joginder Pal Ratra, DAG, Punjab.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the
petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN)
JUDGE
15.07.2019 yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2019.07.15 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Satnam Singh
State of Punjab
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
