Petitioners withdrew the present petition as they could not be contacted by their advocate. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
124
CRM-M-6885-2019 (O & M) Date of Decision: 11.04.2019
HARWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS
..... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has not been able to contact the petitioners despite his repeated attempts, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE
April 11, 2019 A.Kaundal
Whether speaking/ reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
AMIT KAUNDAL 2019.04.11 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
10
HARWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
