Petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case involving injuries and attempted murder. Court held no need for custodial interrogation and without discussing merits, permitted bail on furnishing bond.
Petitioner released on bail subject to furnishing personal/surety bonds in sum of `50,000/- with one surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
221
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-6260 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 08, 2019
Sunil @ Dhilu
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Ajay Vijarania, Advocate for the petitioner.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.0181 dated 28.09.2018 under Sections 341, 307, 427, 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Behal, District Bhiwani.
Notice of motion.
Mr.Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record.
As per prosecution version, present petitioner is named in the FIR and he was driving the motorcycle. The petitioner was not armed with any weapon. Co-accused has fired upon the complainant but it is a no
VINEET GULATI 2019.03.08 16:15 I attest to the accuracy andinjury case. authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CRM No.M-6260 of 2019
-2-
The petitioner has been in custody since 29.10.2018. He is not required for custodial interrogation as he is in judicial custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
March 08, 2019 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
VINEET GULATI 2019.03.08 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted regular bail in the present case.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sunil @ Dhilu
State of Haryana
INDERJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
