Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the petition for non-compliance with a prior order dated 01.11.2018 requiring the petitioner to join the investigation.
Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed due to non-compliance with prior court order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-48833-2018
Date of decision: 08.02.2019
Shailender
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case FIR No. 169 dated 07.11.2017 registered under Sections 406, 420, 447, 448 and 506 IPC at Police Station Kheri Pul, Faridabad.
SI Silk Ram, who is the Investigating Officer in the instant case submits that despite directions of this Court vide order dated 01.11.2018, the petitioner did not join the investigation.
In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for non-compliance of order dated 01.11.2018.
February 08, 2019 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2019.02.11 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail in an IPC case when the petitioner failed to join the investigation per earlier court orders.
Shailender
State of Haryana
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
