COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
Interim order dated 01.12.2018 made absolute; petitioners directed to join investigation if required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-48247 of 2018 Date of decision: 26.03.2019
Sanjay and another
..Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Arun Beniwal, DAG, Haryana for the respondent -State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in pursuance of order dated 01.12.2018, the petitioners have joined investigation and recovery has also been effected. The same has been affirmed by learned State counsel on instructions from HC Shamsher Singh.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel, interim order dated 01.12.2018 passed by this Court in favour of the petitioners is made absolute.
Petition is disposed of accordingly.
However, the petitioners are directed to join investigation, if required by the Investigating Officer.
26.03.2019 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
NEETU RANI 2019.03.28 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim order passed in the petition should be made absolute.
Sanjay and another
State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
