Taro & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-46796 of 2018 Date of Decision: 10.04.2019
Taro and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:None for the petitioners.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Even order dated 04.12.2018 has also not been complied with.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) April 10, 2019 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.04.11 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Taro
State of Haryana
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court