Petitioner filed a petition which was dismissed as infructuous. The State submitted an affidavit reporting the petitioner was found innocent during investigation, rendering the petition unnecessary.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41591-2018
Date of Decision: 12.04.2019
Parmeet
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Ashish Pannu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. RK Makkar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Vishal Malik, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
By filing status report by way of affidavit of Sh. Satish Kumar Gautam, Deputy Superintendent of Police City, Panipat, learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that during investigation, the petitioner was found innocent.
The same is taken on record. Be tagged at the appropriate place.
In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
April 12, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2019.05.06 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Parmeet
State of Haryana
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
