Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in FIR No.194 under Sections 302, 328, 34 IPC. State counsel stated petitioner joined investigation and is not required for interrogation. Court made earlier order dated 29.1.2019 and disposed of the matter.
Application for anticipatory bail made absolute and disposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3980 of 2019 Date of Decision: 10.05.2019
Ritu
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case FIR No.194 dated 15.11.2018 registered under Sections 302, 328, 34 IPC at Police Station Rajaund.
On instructions from, SI Dalbir Singh, learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 29.1.2019, passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) May 10, 2019 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.05.10 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. deserves to be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ritu
State of Haryana
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
