The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition with liberty after the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition while reserving the right to approach an alternative forum.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
112
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.3920 of 2019 Date of decision: 19.03.2019
Radha Krishan
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail his alternative remedy, in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE
19.03.2019 yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2019.03.19 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Radha Krishan
State of Punjab
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
