Quashed

Kuldeep Masih @ Kuldeep Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC5 Apr 2019CRM-M/38218/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC and all subsequent proceedings against the petitioner, accepting the trial court's report of a voluntary compromise between the parties. The dispute was settled amicably, and the court allowed the quashing to foster peace.

What did the court decide?

Quashed FIR No.27 dated 19.05.2018 and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioner.

Kuldeep Masih @ Kuldeep Kumar Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CRM-M-38218 of 2018

¶2

--1--

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-38218 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION:-05.04.2019

¶5

KULDEEP MASIH @ KULDEEP KUMAR ...PETITIONER...

¶6

¶7

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

¶8

...RESPONDENTS...

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

¶10

Present: Mr. Ithlesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Harpreet Multani, AAG, Punjab.

¶12

None for respondent No.2.

¶13

¶14

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been made for quashing FIR No.27 dated 19.05.2018, registered under Section 420 IPC at Police Station Bholath, District Kapurthala (P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise deed dated 19.07.2018 (P-2).

¶16

Pursuant to order dated 28.11.2018, of this Court, parties appeared before the trial Court on 05.01.2019 for recording their statements. Learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kapurthala, has submitted her report vide letter bearing No.12 dated 05.01.2019 duly forwarded by learned District and Sessions Judge, Kapurthala, vide Endst. No.42 dated 09.01.2019.

¶17

According to the reports, ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class,

¶18

SONIKA 2019.04.05 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

CRM-M-38218 of 2018

¶20

--2--

¶21

Kapurthala, is satisfied that parties have entered into compromise voluntarily and without any threat, coercion or pressure and their compromise is genuine one and both the parties have made statement in the court voluntarily and without any pressure.

¶22

In compliance of order dated 20.02.2019, original receipts regarding deposit of costs of `15,000/- have also been produced in Court today. The same are taken on record. Be tagged at appropriate place.

¶23

Considering the report of ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kapurthala dated 05.01.2019 and the fact that the compromise will bring peace and harmony in relations between the parties, aforesaid FIR No.27 dated 19.05.2018 along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua the petitioner only.

¶24

Disposed of accordingly.

¶25

05.04.2019 sonika		(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
whether speaking/reasoned: whether reportable:	Yes/No Yes/No

¶26

SONIKA 2019.04.05 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Kuldeep Masih @ Kuldeep Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep Masih @ Kuldeep Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gobind Jakhar and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Lahri Singh Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Ravinder Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Punjab

Mohinder Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Azad @ Bhanja Vs State of Haryana

Badho Devi and Ors. Vs Kamal Kumar and Ors.