The High Court of Punjab and Haryana heard a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Counsel stated the petitioner joined investigation. The court upheld an earlier order and disposed of the matter.
Order dated 20.02.2019 granting anticipatory bail was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3736-2019 DATE OF DECISION:-13.05.2019
KARTIK SHARMA
...PETITIONER...
V.
STATE OF PUNJAB
...RESPONDENT...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. A.S. Gill, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case FIR No.147 dated 22.12.2018, registered under Sections 384, 382, 342, 420, 506 and 120-B IPC, Police Station City Fazilka, District Fazilka.
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 20.02.2019 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
13.05.2019
sonika
(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No whether reportable: Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.05.14 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in the pending criminal proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KARTIK SHARMA
STATE OF PUNJAB
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
