Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with an FIR registered for crimes including cheating and drug-related offences. State counsel submitted the petitioner joined investigation. Court made earlier bail order absolute.
Order dated 09.01.2019 granting anticipatory bail made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-365 of 2019 Date of Decision: 02.04.2019
Sandeep
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. R.B. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.670 dated 07.10.2018 registered under Sections 336, 420, 34 IPC, Sections 18A, 18-C of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, Sections 15(2) and 15(3) IPC Act at Police Station Mujessar, District Faridabad.
On instructions from ASI Sarbar Singh, learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 09.01.2019 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) April 02, 2019 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.04.03 13:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be allowed after the petitioner has joined investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep
State of Haryana
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
