Manoj Goswami v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge bench held that since the petitioner joined investigations and had no role in the alleged telecast, the interim bail order dated 10.1.2019 was made absolute till the submission of the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C.
What did the court decide?
Made the interim bail order dated 10.1.2019 absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-360 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision : March 28, 2019
Manoj Goswami
....Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : Mr. NS Shekhawat, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms. Dimple Jain, DAG, Haryana for the State Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate, for the complainant
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Sukhbir Singh, PS City Narnaul though opposed the grant of bail of the petitioner but accepts the fact that the alleged telecast has been made by STV Haryana News Channel in which the petitioner has no role.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim bail granted to the petitioner in proceedings for alleged telecast should be made absolute.
Under what conditions the petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds after submission of the report.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoj Goswami
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Fateh Deep Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/360/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court