The judgment is an order referring to detailed reasons recorded in a separate order. It contains no independent reasoning, summary of facts, or substantive legal proposition to index.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-35612-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 27.9.2019
Shaminder Sing h
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate with Mr. Sarbuland S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate for the complainant.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)
For order, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of
even date passed in CRM-M-33795-2019 Kulvir Singh @ Keera Vs. State
of Punjab.
| 27.9.2019 kamal |
(Gurv | inder Singh Gill) Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
KAMAL KUMAR 2019.09.30 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shaminder Singh
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
