Disposed

Satnam Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Jan 2019CRM-M/3516/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana considered a criminal reference petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking action against defaulting police officials. The Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar, to act upon a specific representation received by him and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Amritsar, to act upon the representation dated 12.12.2018.

Satnam Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh

¶2

Criminal Misc. No. M-3516 of 2019

¶3

Date of Decision: 25.01.2019

¶4

Satnam Singh

¶5

... Petitioner(s)

¶6

Versus State of Punjab and Others ... Respondent(s)

¶7

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

¶8

Present: Mr. Rahul Popal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶9

Shekher Dhawan, J.

¶10

Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions to respondents No. 2 & 3 for taking appropriate legal action against respondents No. 4 to 8 or to conduct investigation in fair and proper manner.

¶11

Petitioner, who is a complainant in this case, is aggrieved that occurrence had taken place on 30.11.2018 and he sustained injuries and was medicolegally examined as well. But the police did not register the case and no action has been taken so far. Petitioner also made representation dated 12.12.2018 (Annexure P4) to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police District Amritsar, but still no action has been taken thereon.

¶12

Notice of motion.

¶13

On asking of the Court, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singla, Senior DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ2019.01.25 14:33 Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶14

Criminal Misc. No. M-3516 of 2019 2

¶15

No.1 to 3. A complete copy of paper-book be provided to him during the course of the day.

¶16

Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and perusal of record, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police District Amritsar, is directed to look into the representation dated 12.12.2018 (Annexure P4) and take required action, if any, as per law.

¶17

With the aforesaid observations made and directions issued, the

¶18

present petition stands disposed of.

¶19

( Shekher Dhawan) Judge January 25, 2019 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶20

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2019.01.25 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Satnam Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satnam Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govind @ Gullu and Another Vs State of Haryana

Vijaya Kundu Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Rajwant Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Brijesh Kumari and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Neetu Rani and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sushila Vs State of Haryana and Ors.