Disposed

Surinder Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Jan 2019CRM-M/350/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a miscellaneous criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought directions for fair investigation in a case involving sections 67 of IT Act and 509 IPC. The Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police to act on an outstanding representation regarding inaction against an accused police personnel.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to look the representation dated 11.12.2018 and take the required decision thereon.

Surinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh

¶2

Criminal Misc. No. M-350 of 2019

¶3

Date of Decision: 09.01.2019

Surinder Singh

... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab and Others

¶8

... Respondent(s)

¶9

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

¶10

Present: Mr. Bhrigu Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶11

Shekher Dhawan, J.

¶12

Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to the respondents to complete the investigation in a fair ad proper manner in case FIR No. 138 dated 16.08.2018, registered under Section 67 of the Information ad Technology Act, 2000 and Section 509 IPC at Police Station Guru Harsahai, District Ferozepur.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that FIR was registered on 16.08.2018, but no action has been taken against Jaswinder Singh, as he is working as Head Constable in the Punjab Police and is on duty as a Gunman with senior police officer. For that purpose, petitioner has also made a representation dated 11.12.2018 (Annexure P2) to the Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur, but no still no action has been taken thereon.

¶14

Notice of motion.

¶15

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2019.01.09 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

Criminal Misc. No. M-350 of 2019 2

¶17

On asking of the Court, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singla, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents. A complete copy of paper-book be provided to him during the course of the day.

¶18

In view of above, present petition stands disposed of with the directions to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozeupr to look the representation dated 11.12.2018 (Annexure P2) and take the required decision thereon, as per law.

¶19

( Shekher Dhawan) Judge January 09, 2019 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶20

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2019.01.09 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Surinder Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surinder Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhjeet Kaur and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Nisha and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Vakila and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Harpreet Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Hrinderjeeet Singh @ Harwinderjeet Singh @ Raju Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Vishavdeep Singh Rana Vs State of Punjab and Others