The petitioner moved for regular bail. Counsel stated the petitioner was acquitted. The court disposed of the bail petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
223
CRM-M-333-2019 (O & M) Date of Decision: 08.04.2019
GAGANPREET SINGH @ GAAGI @ DAMANPREET
..... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB
.... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: Mr.J.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab.
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petition for regular bail has become infructuous as the petitioner has been acquitted at the conclusion of the trial.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE
April 08, 2019 A.Kaundal
Whether speaking/ reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
AMIT KAUNDAL 2019.04.08 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
23
GAGANPREET SINGH @ GAAGI @ DAMANPREET
STATE OF PUNJAB
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
