Petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner had expired, rendering the matter infructuous; the court disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-2957 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : March 28, 2019
Avnish Kumar @ Avinash
....Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : Mr. Karan Padam, Advocate for Mr. CS Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab, for the State/ respondent no. 1
Mr. PS Bal, Advocate, for respondent no. 2
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has since expired and the present matter has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of as such.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) March 28, 2019 Judge 'tiwana' Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.03.29 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Avnish Kumar @ Avinash
State of Punjab
another
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
