Emmanuel Ikechukwu @ Godwin v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.…
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.: 224
Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-2939 of 2018 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 23, 2019
Emmanuel Ikechukwu @ Godwin
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab
..... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
PRESENT : - Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Varun Isshar, Central Government Standing Counsel for Union of India.
. . .
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J (Oral)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Jagraj Singh, has informed that the trial is at the fag end as all the PWs have been examined and that infact, even the statement of accused in terms of Section 313 Cr.P.C. stands recorded.
In view of the aforestated position, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Gurvinder Singh Gill) July 23, 2019 Judge avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No
AVIN KUMAR 2019.07.23 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Emmanuel Ikechukwu @ Godwin
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court