Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR via Section 482 Cr.P.C. due to a compromise agreement. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner remained unrepresented over multiple dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-2916 of 2019 Date of Decision: 22.05.2019
Amandeep Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:None for the petitioner. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for quashing FIR No.20 dated 23.01.2011 registered under Sections 454, 380, 452, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station Aadmpur, District Jalandhar, on the basis of compromise dated 18.12.2018 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties.
Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has been declared proclaimed offender.
On previous date i.e. 03.05.2019 also petitioner had gone unrepresented. Even today, none is present on his behalf. Therefore, it can safely be inferred that petitioner or his counsel is no more interested in pursuing this petition.
In view of above, petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) May 22, 2019 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.05.24 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amandeep Singh
State of Punjab
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
