Raj Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2019 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES…
of 2019 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No.M-25374 of 2019
1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-36841-2019 and CRM-38837-2019 in Crl. Misc. No.M-25374 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.12.2019
Raj Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present : Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab.
Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral)
The application is allowed.
The orders passed by this Court in CRM-M-31722 of 2012 and those passed by the trial Court at different stages and in different petitions, are ordered to be taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
The aforesaid orders, including the charges framed against the petitioner and his co-accused, having been placed on record, Mr. C.M. Munjal, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take all pleas as are legally available to him at the time of defence of his case.
SATYAWAN 2019.12.16 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2
Crl. Misc. No.M-25374 of 2019
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty naturally
always available to an accused.
11.12.2019
Satyawan
(Amol Rattan Singh) Judge
Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes Whether reportable: no
SATYAWAN 2019.12.16 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Raj Kumar
State of Punjab
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court