The petition was withdrawn by the petitioners on the ground that respondent No. 2 was outside India. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No. M-2144 of 2019
Date of Decision: 18.03.2019
Sandeep Singh and Another ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and Another ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan. Present: Mr. A.S.Khosa, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Shekher Dhawan, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that at present respondent No.2-Gurmeet Singh is not in India and prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, at this stage, with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh one with better particulars at appropriate stage.
In view of above, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
( Shekher Dhawan) Judge
March 18, 2019 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2019.03.18 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sandeep Singh
Another
State of Punjab
Another
Shekher Dhawan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
