Devi Dayal v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13514 of 2018 Date of Decision: 27.02.2019
Devi Dayal
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. Vinay Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep S. Gill, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for issuance of direction to conduct fair and unbiased investigation in case FIR No.0087 dated 01.06.2017 registered under Section 304 IPC (Section 304A IPC added lateron) at Police Station City Rupnagar.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sucha Ram, submits that instant petition has rendered infructuous in view of the fact that prayer made by the petitioner has already been met with.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(RAMENDRA JAIN)
February 27, 2019 R.S.
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.03.02 13:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Devi Dayal
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court