The high court dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner as it had been voluntarily withdrawn by his counsel.
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13052 of 2018 Date of Decision: 05.02.2019
Parmod Nagpal
....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:- Mr. Vijay Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep S. Gill, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to
withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) February 05, 2019 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.02.06 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Parmod Nagpal
The State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
