Thin miscellaneous order allowing the petition by reference to a detailed order passed in a separate but related matter on the same date. No distinct reasons are provided in this text.
Petition allowed in reference to a separate detailed order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No.M-12791 of 2008
.....
Date of decision:14.05.2019
M/s Pepsico India Holdings Private Ltd. and another
.....Petitioners
v.
State of Punjab and another
.....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh
.....
Present: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Bhatra, Mr. Rohit Khanna and Mr. Arshdeep Singh Cheema, Advocates for the petitioners in CRM-M-10982, 12790, 12791 of 2008 and 6744 of 2009.
Ms. Monika Jalota, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.
None for respondent No.2.
Inderjit Singh, J.
The criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. For reasons, see separate detailed order passed today in Criminal Misc. No.M-10982 of 2008, The Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Punjab and
another.
May 14, 2019. (Inderjit Singh) Judge hsp NOTE: Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.05.28 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
M/s Pepsico India Holdings Private Ltd. and another
State of Punjab and another
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
